G20: Second environment and climate sustainability working group meeting to begin tomorrow at Gandhinagar
"Such comments don't matter": Brajesh Pathak on Akhilesh Yadav's statement that Atiq's vehicle will be overturned
Launch of 36 OneWeb satellites with ISRO, NewSpace India marks key milestone to enable global connectivity
BJP's OBC MPs to meet party chief Nadda in Delhi; Rahul Gandhi's "insulting" remark among topics of discussion
Plea seeking early hearing on Karnataka HC judgement for upholding Hijab ban mentioned in SC
New Delhi: A plea seeking an early hearing of the petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court's order for upholding a ban on Hijab in educational institutes in the state was mentioned before the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora mentioned the plea challenging Karnataka HC's judgement before the bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana. CJI NV Ramana said that he will constitute a bench and mentioned that one of the judges was not well and asked the petitioner to wait.
CJI also said that if judges would have been fine, it would have been listed.
Various petitioners have approached the apex court challenging the Karnataka HC order upholding the Karnataka government's order which directs strict enforcement of schools and college uniform rules.
One of the appeals in the top court has alleged "step-motherly behaviour of the government authorities, which have prevented students from practising their faith and resulted in an unwanted law and order situation".
The appeal said that the High Court in its impugned order "had vehemently failed to apply its mind and was unable to understand the gravity of the situation as well as the core aspect of the Essential Religious Practices enshrined under Article 25 of the Constitution of India".
"Wearing of Hijab or headscarf is a practice that is essential to the practice of Islam," it added.
A bench of Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit, and Justice JM Khazi had held that the prescription of uniforms is a reasonable restriction that students could not object to and dismissed various petitions challenging a ban on Hijab in education institutions saying they are without merit.
The Hijab row erupted in January this year when the Government PU College in Udupi allegedly barred six girls wearing the hijab from entering. Following this, the girls sat in protest outside college over being denied entry.
After this, boys of several colleges in Udupi started attending classes wearing saffron scarves. This protest spread to other parts of the state as well leading to protests and agitations in several places in Karnataka.
As a result, the Karnataka government said that all students must adhere to the uniform and banned both hijab and saffron scarves till an expert committee decided on the issue.
On February 5, the pre-University education board released a circular stating that the students could only wear the uniform approved by the school administration and that no other religious attire would be allowed in colleges.
The order stated that in case a uniform is not prescribed by management committees, then students should wear dresses that go well with the idea of equality and unity, and do not disturb the social order.
A batch of petitions was filed against the government's rule in the Karnataka High Court by some girls seeking permission to wear the hijab in educational institutions.
On February 10, the High Court issued an interim order stating that students should not wear any religious attire to classes till the court issued the final order. The hearings related to the Hijab case were concluded on February 25 and the court had reserved its judgement. (ANI)